What is the
role of Agile Program Management function in these two areas – ‘Awareness
Building and Knowledge Management’?
These two areas go beyond generic training on new joiner induction or on-boarding.
I am writing this post to explain how these two areas go beyond the normal on-boarding
or induction process and why those two are important drivers in Agile Program
Management.
Typically we
get trained or certified team members to form cross-functional teams or we
induct skilled team members and put them through appropriate additional training
and/or certification programs. Once this happens, team members get into main
stream iterative/incremental delivery. Teams that are self-enabled and
high-performing experience perpetual learning that happens all the time. In
small projects that involve one or two such teams, awareness building and
knowledge management are intrinsic. Those who have been through this or those
who imagine standalone or small teams may even wonder why someone would even
worry about these two areas! This is
because Agile is about team learning and continuous improvement.
Well. That
happens. That happens in small projects – projects that involve one or two or
three cross-functional teams. How about
large projects or programs? – for example, programs that involve multiple
hundreds of team members – 400 to 1000 team members with 40 to 100
cross-functional teams that are geographically distributed?
I am sure
you got the context. In most cases Agile
Program Management involves complexity in terms of team size, variety of
projects, geographical distribution and so on. This is when Agile Program
Managers cannot afford to ignore ‘Awareness Building and Knowledge Management’.
Awareness Building
and Knowledge Management are continuous activities. There have to be multiple
mechanisms to promote or implement these two areas. There can be mechanism such
as visual posters, lightening talks, regular or periodic sessions that involve
topics related to technologies, domain concepts, and so on. Gamification is worth considering in large teams
to ensure continuous awareness building and knowledge management.
Unlike small
projects that involve one or two cross-functional teams that last for about
nine to twelve months, large programs involve tens or hundreds of
cross-functional teams and last for multiple years. Continuous focus on awareness building and
knowledge management becomes a necessity to sustainable rigor in
execution. Remember, a 10 percent attrition
in program of 500 team members is nothing but 50 people moving out and moving
in year on year. When there is a churn
of this magnitude or higher, on-boarding or induction may become individual
based but not team based because you don’t get to induct a team or train a
group of individuals all the time. With consistent pressure on sustaining
velocity trends or meeting release timelines, the focus on delivering would supersede
everything else. This is where a continuous focus on awareness building and knowledge
management can strengthen the ecosystem.
How can we
going about this? Form a team of motivated individuals who want to contribute
to this area. Focus on a) creating an infrastructure that radiates knowledge
and improves awareness – these can be posters, email flyers, knowledge management
portal, etc. b) budgeting time for periodic knowledge sharing sessions facilitated
by team members for team members, c) involving geographically distributed teams by
sharing content or inviting them to participate. Also, include these in your program management radar or dashboard. Do you have any additional ideas? Please share.
Have you
seen a new project team in your program repeating the same mistakes that one of
the mature teams came across couple of years ago? Have you seen the same types of issues and
conflicts happening in new teams year after year? Have you seen a newly
inducted developer doing a wrong bug-fix most probably the same way someone did
years ago and learned a better way through experience? If yes, I am sure you
will understand how these incidents can be better understood and handled, and minimized - if applicable, through consistent focus on awareness building and knowledge sharing sessions.
Also, I am sure you don’t assume that the initial induction program or training
or certification can do the magic to stop these!
Tell me now. Don’t Agile Program Managers need to keep track of these two areas or have them represented
in some form (probably through a measure or metric) on their program management dashboard?
1 comment:
Very true. I feel we should have some time kept aside on a regular cadence which the team can devote to self improvement e.g. hackathons etc. SAFe has an IP iteration.
Post a Comment